https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:51823 .80) were good for both PROMIS measures and comparable to or better than all legacy measures. At the recommended mild cut-point (55), PROMIS-A-SF had sensitivity (.67) comparable to or better than all the legacy measures, whereas PROMIS-A-CAT sensitivity (.59) was lower than GAD-7 (.67) and HADS-A (.62), but comparable to PSYCH-6 and higher than DASS-A, DASS-S and DT. Sensitivity for both was.79. A reduced cut-point of 51 on both PROMIS measures improved sensitivity (.83–.84) although specificity was only adequate (.61–.62). Conclusions: The convergent and criterion validity of the PROMIS anxiety measures in cancer populations was confirmed as equivalent, but not superior to, established measures (GAD-7 and HADS-A). The PROMIS-A-CAT did not demonstrate clear advantages over PROMIS-A-SF.]]> Wed 08 May 2024 09:59:12 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:49857 Tue 06 Jun 2023 19:57:36 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:39147 0.7). Discussion: The Nurses’ Disaster Response Competencies Assessment Questionnaire showed good internal consistency, adequate reproducibility, and appropriate feasibility for use to evaluate nurses’ competencies for disaster response.]]> Thu 19 May 2022 15:26:36 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:14517 Sat 24 Mar 2018 08:19:46 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:18202 Sat 24 Mar 2018 08:04:42 AEDT ]]>